Solutions Review: Getting Ahead of Continuous Threat Exposure Management with CAASM
On November 8, 2024, NetSPI CTO Tom Parker was featured in the Solutions Review article, Getting Ahead of Continuous Threat Exposure Management with CAASM. Read the preview below or view it online.
+++
For security teams, gaining comprehensive visibility into a company’s attack surface is becoming an increasingly daunting, but mission-critical task. Further, this capability is one of the cornerstones of a Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) program, as defined by Gartner. The sheer number of systems in use today—from legacy internal infrastructure to cloud-based applications, and the proliferation of personal devices through bring-your-own-device (BYoD) policies—has expanded the scope and complexity of many of the common exposures that our teams have been accustomed to addressing over the past decade. This modern attack surface is highly dynamic and constantly shifting, making it difficult for security teams to maintain the necessary oversight.
You can read the article here.
Explore More News
NetSPI and Synack to Merge, Forming A Leading Offensive Cybersecurity Platform
September 2, 2026 – NetSPI®, a global leader in modern penetration testing, and Synack, a global leader in continuous security validation, today announced a definitive agreement to merge and form the industry’s leading offensive cybersecurity platform. The combination brings together two of the premier expert-led offensive security organizations and integrates agentic AI across the combined platform to deliver continuous testing and validation at enterprise scale.
NetSPI Expands Suite of AI-Powered Continuous Pentesting Services as Organizational Attack Surfaces Grow
NetSPI expands suite of Human-Led, AI-Powered Continuous Pentesting Services, including a first-of-its-kind AI Findings Validation service, as well as continuous testing for web applications and internal networks.
AI’s Role in the Next Era of Pentesting
This article discusses how AI can accelerate penetration testing, but without human expertise to validate findings and apply business context, organizations risk confusing faster output with stronger security.