
How Often Should Organizations Conduct Penetration Tests?
TL;DR
Regular penetration testing is one of the best ways to keep your business secure. NetSPI’s application pentesting services identify, validate, and prioritize security vulnerabilities in your web, mobile, thick client, and virtual applications, bringing together dedicated security experts, intelligent process, and advanced technology to improve application security and reduce risk to your business. This blog explores the factors that influence testing frequency, dives into industry best practices, and explains when and why your organization should conduct regular penetration tests.
Introduction
Penetration testing, also called pentesting or a pen test, is a cybersecurity exercise in which a security testing expert, called a pentester, identifies and verifies real-world vulnerabilities by simulating the actions of a skilled threat actor determined to gain privileged access to an IT system or application. Pentesting is essential to any cybersecurity strategy, particularly given the increase in persistence of cyber threats. Proactive measures, like penetration testing, allow organizations to discover weaknesses early and prioritize remediation, reducing the risk of breaches that could cause financial or reputational damage. Read our article titled What is Penetration Testing? to learn more.
Factors That Determine Frequency of Penetration Testing
Industry Compliance Requirements
Penetration testing frequency is driven by a blend of regulatory requirements, risk profiles, and operational changes. Frameworks like PCI DSS mandate penetration tests at least annually and after any significant system changes. HIPAA, while less prescriptive, expects healthcare entities to regularly assess their security posture, making annual or semi-annual testing a best practice. Under GDPR, the onus is on organizations to implement “appropriate” security measures, pushing companies to test as needed based on risk.
Beyond compliance, the rate of change in an organization’s IT environment—such as application updates, infrastructure changes, or cloud migrations—warrants more frequent testing. Similarly, industries with high-value assets or a history of targeted attacks, such as finance or defense, may adopt quarterly or continuous testing to stay ahead of threats.
Organizations also consider the maturity of their security programs. Less mature programs may benefit from more frequent tests to identify foundational gaps, whereas mature programs might integrate penetration testing into broader continuous security validation practices. Ultimately, the right frequency balances compliance obligations, business risk tolerance, and resource availability.
Organization Size and Security Maturity
The complexity of an organization’s IT infrastructure significantly influences how often penetration tests should be conducted. Larger organizations or those with sprawling, distributed systems—such as hybrid cloud environments, numerous endpoints, and interconnected third-party services—face a broader attack surface. This increased complexity introduces more potential vulnerabilities, making frequent testing essential to maintain security visibility and control.
Organizations with high infrastructure complexity must account for continuous system changes, integrations, and potential misconfigurations. Every new application, API, or digital touchpoint creates additional risk vectors that can be exploited if left untested. In these environments, annual testing is rarely sufficient. Instead, quarterly, monthly, or even continuous penetration testing may be required to keep pace with the evolving threat landscape.
Additionally, complexity often correlates with the need for specialized testing—such as red teaming, cloud-specific assessments, or segmentation validation—that further necessitates a more frequent and tailored approach. In contrast, smaller organizations with simpler environments may find annual or biannual testing adequate, particularly if their systems undergo minimal change. Ultimately, as infrastructure complexity grows, so does the need for a strategic, risk-based testing cadence aligned with organizational security maturity and business objectives.
Frequency of System Updates and Changes
The frequency and scale of system updates play a critical role in determining how often organizations should conduct penetration tests. For internally developed software applications, the velocity of code releases—such as in agile or DevOps environments—means new features, bug fixes, and configuration changes are deployed regularly. Each release can unintentionally introduce security vulnerabilities, making regular or even continuous penetration testing essential to catch issues before they’re exploited in production.
High-velocity development cycles benefit from integrating security testing into CI/CD pipelines, but standalone penetration tests still offer value by simulating real-world attack scenarios that automated tools may miss. As release velocity increases, so does the need for more frequent, targeted penetration testing—especially for high-impact systems or customer-facing applications.
Beyond internal development, major software or hardware upgrades—such as operating system migrations, new firewalls, or changes to authentication mechanisms—can alter the security landscape significantly. These changes can inadvertently create new vulnerabilities or reintroduce old ones. Conducting a penetration test after significant updates ensures that new configurations haven’t weakened the organization’s security posture.
In short, testing frequency must align with change frequency, ensuring that evolving systems remain resilient against emerging threats.
Cyber Threat Landscape and Emerging Risks
The cyber threat landscape is constantly evolving, with new vulnerabilities, attack techniques, and threat actors emerging daily. Traditional, infrequent penetration testing cannot keep pace with this dynamic environment. As zero-day exploits, ransomware, and supply chain attacks grow more sophisticated, organizations must adopt ongoing security testing to stay ahead. Continuous or frequent penetration tests help identify vulnerabilities introduced by emerging threats before attackers do. This proactive approach ensures that defenses remain effective against current risks, not just those known during the last test, making regular assessments a critical component of modern cyber resilience.
Best Practices for Scheduling Penetration Tests
Quarterly vs. Bi-Annual vs. Annual Testing—What’s Best?
Choosing the right penetration testing frequency depends on a mix of business type, size, risk exposure, and software development practices. High-risk industries like finance, healthcare, or e-commerce—where sensitive data is processed or stored—should consider quarterly testing to proactively manage threats. Large enterprises with complex infrastructures or distributed teams also benefit from frequent testing due to increased attack surfaces and change velocity.
Bi-annual testing is suitable for mid-sized organizations with moderate risk exposure or those undergoing fewer infrastructure or application changes. For small businesses with low-risk profiles and minimal system updates, annual testing may suffice—especially when complemented with other security measures like vulnerability scanning and code reviews.
Modern software development cycles, particularly those using agile or DevOps methodologies, require a more release-based testing approach. Major releases—such as platform overhauls or new modules—should trigger full penetration tests. Minor or feature updates may warrant targeted testing, focusing on new or altered components. This ensures that newly introduced code doesn’t create unforeseen vulnerabilities.
Keep in mind that penetration testing should be both calendar-driven and event-driven, balancing periodic assessments with testing aligned to development and operational milestones to maintain a strong and responsive security posture.
The Role of Continuous Security Monitoring
While pentesting provides valuable point-in-time insights, it cannot detect threats as they occur. Continuous security monitoring fills this gap by offering real-time visibility into network activity, system behavior, and potential intrusions. It enables organizations to detect, respond to, and mitigate threats instantly, reducing dwell time and limiting damage. When combined with periodic penetration testing, continuous monitoring ensures a layered defense—testing systems for known weaknesses while actively watching for new or emerging threats. This proactive approach is essential in today’s threat landscape, where attackers move quickly and traditional testing alone isn’t enough to ensure sustained security.
How to Choose the Right Penetration Testing Provider
Selecting the right penetration testing provider is critical for effective security assurance. Look for firms with certified professionals (e.g., OSCP, CISSP), proven experience in your industry, and a methodical, standards-based approach (such as OWASP or NIST). Strong communication skills and the ability to tailor testing to your environment are also essential. Equally important is the quality of reporting—clear, detailed findings with risk ratings, technical evidence, and actionable remediation guidance empower your team to address vulnerabilities effectively. A good provider doesn’t just find issues—they help you understand and fix them to strengthen your overall security posture.
Looking for a great place to start your search for the perfect provider? NetSPI can help. NetSPI’s application pentesting services identify, validate, and prioritize security vulnerabilities in your web, mobile, thick client, and virtual applications, bringing together dedicated security experts, intelligent process, and advanced technology to improve application security and reduce risk to your business.
Choose NetSPI For Pentesting
Regular penetration testing is so important for maintaining a strong security posture. Engaging ethical hacking services and third-party audits further strengthens security by offering an objective evaluation from external experts, identifying blind spots, and providing actionable insights to reduce vulnerabilities and improve overall defense strategies. Ensure your organization is protected from cyber threats.
Contact us today to schedule a penetration test and strengthen your cybersecurity defenses!
Contact us today to schedule a penetration test and strengthen your cybersecurity defenses!
Explore More Blog Posts

CVE-2025-4660: Forescout SecureConnector RCE
Learn about the high-risk RCE vulnerability in Forescout SecureConnector allows attackers to turn security agents into C2 channels.

Part 2: Ready for Red Teaming? Crafting Realistic Scenarios Reflecting Real-World Threats
Learn to craft realistic red team scenarios that reflect real-world threats. Gain actionable insights to strengthen detection and response capabilities.

Detecting Authorization Flaws in Java Spring via Source Code Review (SCR)
Discover how secure code review catches privilege escalation vulnerabilities in Java Spring apps that pentests miss - identify insecure patterns early.