Forbes: X Under Attack—Who Was Really Behind The Musk Platform Outages?
Forbes featured NetSPI CTO, Tom Parker, in the article, X Under Attack—Dark Storm Says It Was Behind Musk Platform DDoS, which explores the attack on X and the challenges of attributing such incidents to specific threat actors.
Read the preview below or view it online.
+ + +
Attributing Cyberattacks Is Inherently Complex, Security Experts Say Of X DDoS
According to Tom Parker, chief technology officer at NetSPI, “the magnitude of this incident strongly suggests the involvement of a sophisticated threat actor,” be that nation-state or hacktivist in nature. “We must acknowledge that attributing an attack of this scale is notoriously difficult,” Parker concluded, “precisely because such adversaries are highly adept at concealing their tracks.” One thing that Parker was very clear about is that we should all be “extremely cautious about pointing fingers and sabre rattling without clear and compelling evidence to demonstrate capability, motive, and likely benefit for the party involved.”
Read the full article here.
Authors:
Explore More News
NetSPI and Synack to Merge, Forming A Leading Offensive Cybersecurity Platform
September 2, 2026 – NetSPI®, a global leader in modern penetration testing, and Synack, a global leader in continuous security validation, today announced a definitive agreement to merge and form the industry’s leading offensive cybersecurity platform. The combination brings together two of the premier expert-led offensive security organizations and integrates agentic AI across the combined platform to deliver continuous testing and validation at enterprise scale.
NetSPI Expands Suite of AI-Powered Continuous Pentesting Services as Organizational Attack Surfaces Grow
NetSPI expands suite of Human-Led, AI-Powered Continuous Pentesting Services, including a first-of-its-kind AI Findings Validation service, as well as continuous testing for web applications and internal networks.
AI’s Role in the Next Era of Pentesting
This article discusses how AI can accelerate penetration testing, but without human expertise to validate findings and apply business context, organizations risk confusing faster output with stronger security.