NetSPI Imformation Security Consulting
NetSPI Blog

Posts Tagged ‘PCI SSC’

PCI 2.0 scoring matrix released to the public (now your kids can play “PCI Auditor” at home!)

| Tuesday, September 27th, 2011

The PCI Security Standards Council (SSC) has recently released the latest version of the 2.0 Report on Compliance (ROC) Reporting Instructions (formerly called the “scorecard”).  This document had previously been for use by QSA auditors only; it is the secret sauce used to perform a Level 1 PCI audit. For those of you lucky enough to have gone through a L1 audit, the “scorecard” is the super secret document that the QSA kept stored on the triple encrypted drive in the TEMPEST-approved tamperproof tungsten-lined briefcase handcuffed to her wrist.  QSA’s were not allowed to share the criteria on which the company was being audited (scored) on; the reporting instructions require the QSA to perform one or more of the following validation steps for every requirement:

  • Observation of system settings, configurations
  • Documentation review
  • Interview with personnel
  • Observation of process, action, state
  • Identify sample

Well, good news everyone!  The document is now available to the general public. Hopefully, this will eliminate some of those awkward moments that seem to always come up during an audit:

QSA: “You need a documented policy that says you use network address translation. That’s not written down anywhere.”

Customer: “Can you show me where it says I need to do that in the DSS?”

QSA: “You won’t find it there, but I promise it says it somewhere.  I’m not allowed to show you, just trust me, you need it”.

Customer: “Can you just let me peek over your shoulder?”

QSA: “If you saw it, I would have to have your memory wiped.  Have you ever seen “Men in Black“”?

Customer: “I’m calling Security”.

It’s pretty hard to follow the rules when you’re not allowed to know what they are.  With this document’s public release a company can actually evaluate their controls and compliance program against the same standards that a QSA will use; no more guessing how to meet a requirement,  no more conversations where the auditor gives a seemingly arbitrary failing finding, with a “because I said so” for the explanation.  This should also allow for organizations to get a much better picture of the intent and expected implementation of a requirement by understanding how the controls will be assessed.  Well done, SSC.

Permalink | Email the Author | No Comments

Questions on PA-DSS from Software Companies and Straight Answers

| Thursday, November 5th, 2009

This post is a result of many, many conversations with software companies regarding the PCI Payment Application Data Security Standard (PA-DSS).  What’s really interesting about all those conversations is that they tend to fit into two categories – the first involves software companies that know that they need to go through PA-DSS validation and are looking for real guidance, the other typically involves organizations that are looking for someone to tell them that the standard doesn’t apply to them for some reason.

The questions below are the most common ones that we receive from that second group.  Hopefully, the answers will help those non-POS companies that are wondering whether PA-DSS applies to them.

1.    We are a healthcare (or some other type of) software company, not a POS vendor. We’re not even implemented in a retail setting. PA-DSS doesn’t really apply to us, right?

No, this is not correct. If your situation matches the criteria for the standard (just below), then PA-DSS applies. That doesn’t mean that you have to go through the validation process, it just means that you have to go through the validation process if you want to keep selling your software to companies that accept Visa transactions. Keep reading and I’ll explain.

General Criteria:

  • Is the application being sold, distributed, or licensed to a third party?
  • Does the application store, process, or transmit cardholder data (credit card information)?  Note – ‘process’ doesn’t necessarily mean financial transaction. For example, taking and hashing a card number would be considered ‘processing’ cardholder data.

2.    Our company is really a Service Provider – 80% of our business is hosted, and we only sell our software to a subset of our clients for implementation at their location. We don’t have to bother going through this, do we?

According to the PCI SSC, if your software matches the criteria (see #1), then you need to go through the process. In fact, if you haven’t already, you most likely need to go through the full PCI DSS process as a Service Provider as well.

There are exemptions for one-off, customized solutions, but if you are selling the same base application to two or more clients (and, again, you meet the criteria) you need to address PA-DSS.

3.    Isn’t there some way of doing this more cheaply?

Not really. The process of validating an application under PA-DSS is actually quite involved. It includes documentation review, lab testing, interviewing, process and controls review, documentation, documentation, documentation, and some more documentation.

This is not PABP (if you are familiar with the original Visa software security standard). We have seen significant issues with companies that thought they could treat PA-DSS with the same level of attention and effort as they gave to the older standard.

4.    Are the PCI Council and the card brands trying to put my company out of business?

No – I honestly don’t think so. They are just looking to make sure that applications capable of being implemented in a PCI-compliant manner are what are being sold in the marketplace to handle credit card information and transactions. Their interest is primarily in keeping their card data secure and in making sure that the merchant is choosing applications that will support that goal.

5.    Are they really going to enforce this?

Yes, I think they are. Visa has given every indication that they fully intend to enforce PA-DSS validation and, given their willingness to do so on the broader PCI DSS, I would be willing to bet that they won’t back down.

6.    Do my customers need to have our product validated for them to be compliant with the PCI DSS?

No, your customers are not required by the PCI DSS to utilize PA-DSS validated applications today.

In practice (a point stressed at the recent PCI Community Meeting), Visa will be requiring merchants and service providers to use PA-DSS validated applications (unless the applications are developed internally). That Visa announcement makes PA-DSS a practical requirement (even if not technically a PCI requirement) for companies that want to continue accepting Visa as a form of payment.

7.    How long does the PA-DSS process take?

It actually depends heavily on the software vendor. If they are highly motivated, committed, and well prepared (and timing with the PA-QSA matches up), the process can be fairly quick. This isn’t necessarily typical, however.

At NetSPI we work with our PA-DSS clients in a very interactive manner. We want to identify gaps and allow you to address them prior to testing and review being complete. Closing identified gaps requires the software vendor to take real action; without that action and commitment, the process can really drag. There is little the PA-QSA can do to move the process along without that commitment.

8.    Why are there fewer PA-QSAs vs. PCI-QSAs?

In my opinion, it is due to a few things:

  • Application expertise and app security expertise are NECESSARY for PA-DSS – it’s not quite so easy to throw outside resources at PA-DSS and try to survive on a rigid audit process; you actually have to know what you are talking about.
  • The rigorous QA program that the PCI SSC has implemented on the PCI DSS side was actually ‘turned on’ from day one on the PA-DSS side and required a level of documentation and commitment on the part of the PA-QSA that many in the PCI community simply didn’t want to (or couldn’t) handle.
  • In PA-DSS, the relationship between the firm validating the software and the vendor going through validation is extremely important. This isn’t just about an audit and we’re done. If a PA-QSA firm is doing its job correctly, the QSAs are having discussions with their client about future updates, version control issues, architecture issues, how to operationalize future PA-DSS validation efforts, etc. That’s a consulting/partnership relationship, and many in the PCI community aren’t focused on that type of relationship.

9.    Implementing our solution in our PA-DSS partner’s lab is a real pain, do we have to?

Not necessarily – the council prefers that your application be tested in a PA-QSA’s lab, but it’s not required. If it is impractical for the application to be installed in the testing lab (and your PA-QSA feels comfortable defending that opinion), you can bring the PA-QSA to your location.

10.    We think this whole thing is ridiculous. What if we refuse?

You certainly have the right, but the PCI SSC has been very straightforward: the PCI PA-DSS list is to be the de facto standard on PCI–acceptable applications. If your application is not on the list, you are taking a risk, the potential impact of which would most likely go far beyond the expense of going through the process.

11.    We’ve gone through CCHIT (or some other standard that includes security). Aren’t we covered?

No. PA-DSS is not a suggestion from Visa– it’s a requirement. It is also the only standard that is entirely focused on cardholder data (the data that card brands really care about). If your solution has been successfully audited or validated under another security-focused standard, you may have a head start on getting your solution to a PA-DSS-compliant state. That effort may help prepare you for PA-DSS validation.

Permalink | Email the Author | No Comments

European PCI Community Meeting: Some Impressions

| Monday, November 2nd, 2009

The trip back to the U.S. from the European PCI Community Meeting in Prague took about 12 hours. For someone who lives and breathes PCI, that equals one hour for each of the 12 requirements of the Data Security Standard (DSS). Here are my impressions of the conference.

First, the PCI Security Standards Council did another great job of bringing the payments community together to discuss current topics and provide feedback regarding the DSS. Second, I met a lot of interesting people and made numerous contacts during the networking sessions.

Third, the meetings were well attended and provided valuable information. I was able to discuss the current state of compliance with European representatives from acquirers, card brands, merchants, service providers, and fellow QSAs. One thing that stands out from these conversations is that the U.S. remains in the forefront of payments security.

Fourth, from a QSA or practitioner point of view, two topics of special concern emerged during the open-microphone sessions: issuers and logging. These two areas were also brought up at the North American Community Meeting in September. So the feedback from the community on both sides of the Atlantic indicates a need for more clarification and guidance on how organizations that are classified as issuers need to comply, and for more guidance on how to review logs.

Fifth, if you ever have an opportunity to visit Prague, make sure to do so. The city is amazing, and the Czech people are very hospitable to visitors. It was a perfect venue for the European PCI Community Meeting.

Permalink | Email the Author | No Comments

Beyond the PCI Audit: Helping Merchants and Service Providers as a Partner

| Wednesday, October 21st, 2009

At the PCI Community Meeting last month in Las Vegas, one thing was abundantly clear – merchants and service providers need help. The confusion that comes with a complicated, comprehensive security standard, coupled with governance that shifts back and forth between the PCI-SSC and the card brands, has created a situation that requires that a QSA be more than just an auditor for their clients.

Now, I should state that I’m a full supporter of the PCI SSC and the PCI DSS – I’m not here to bash the council or the brands. Security around cardholder data is something that really needed improvement (and continues to need improvement), and the PCI DSS is really just a codified set of best practices with a tight focus on cardholder data.

At the community meeting I noticed that a number of the attendees appeared frustrated by how many times a question to the SSC (or to the card brand representatives to the SSC) elicited a response of “That’s really a brand-specific question and will need to be asked to the individual brands directly.”  By this point most companies recognize that the PCI DSS is not the overall goal for their security strategy – its narrow focus ignores a great deal that organizations need to be concerned about in terms of information security. However, today many organizations still don’t realize that PCI isn’t even ‘complete’ in addressing credit card security – the brands may have important individual guidance that supersedes the PCI DSS.

Which brings me back to my initial statement – people need help and not just audits. The merchant and service provider community is looking for leadership and for partners to work with them to understand the unique and shifting landscape of compliance and security. This includes PCI, but it also includes the broader discussion of what the individual brands require outside of the PCI DSS and the impact of decisions on overall security.

The community expects and, truthfully, deserves this leadership. After all, we’re the experts and they are putting their trust in that expertise. Yes – passing your PCI audit is very important, but it isn’t the only thing that’s important, even within credit card security.

Permalink | Email the Author | No Comments